Michael Owen’s England XI: Do Alan Shearer & David Beckham make the cut?

We and our partners utilize technologies, such as cookies, and collect browsing information to give you the ideal online experience and to personalise the information and advertisements shown to you. Please let us know whether you agree. By Mandeep Sanghera BBC Sport Former England striker Michael Owen’s row with Alan Shearer and the break has been spiced up by complaint of David Beckham this week. Owen was criticised by Shearer for comments he left his newest book about linking Newcastle United, before he hit by questioning his former club and international team-mate’s loyalty to the Magpies. In his new novel, reboot – My Life, My Time, Owen says he still holds some resentment towards Beckham for getting sent off at a World Cup last-16 game against Argentina in 1998, which England lost on penalties. BBC Sport requested Owen to mention his best England XI – since his debut in 1998. Himself wasn’t picked by the 39-year-old , but read on to check whether Shearer and Beckham made the cut – and have your say in the article’s conclusion. Because for a very long time this creation has been satisfied by England players, I would go for a 3-5-2. Look under Terry Venables at Euro 96 and in France at the 1998 World Cup, when we were a team that is dazzling and should’ve gone together with Glenn Hoddle as manager. Then we went through a small devastating period plus it coincided with 4-4-2 and variations of it. I remember playing for the England team and we had Paul Scholes as a midfielder and things like this. It was obvious that 3-5-2 is that the formation that we ought to have embraced and who knows how far we would have gone in eras. At the final World Cup, Gareth Southgate went to 3-5-2, therefore we are suited to it. Glenn Hoddle are the manager, no wonder, since he and 3-5-2 play too. This is a place where we have not been for many years in our strongest. I would say David Seaman is the best goalkeeper within the past couple of decades. He had been a safe pair of handson. At Euro 96 he awakened. He had been a goalkeeper. On pure ability, someone such as David James has got more – however Seaman’s consistency is what made him a very good goalkeeper. He had been a calming influence although I was only with him. Sol Campbell: Sol was an fantastic player. He had a wonderful reading of the game, strength and speed. I’d say he was great on the ball since the other two but, in terms of protecting got him past. He could score goals from set-pieces and was very courageous, very good in the atmosphere. He was strong as a stone for a centre-half. He’s reasonably severe but you may have a joke with Sol too. Everyone’s different. There are 23 gamers, and therefore you don’t get everyone 19, when you match England. He rose into the significant occasion and could defend. Rio Ferdinand: If you are talking about classy players of the first people you consider is Rio Ferdinand. He was the Rolls-Royce of this footballing game really. He made everything seem simple, a small bit like Liverpool centre-back Virgin van Dijk now as it’s almost like he isn’t even trying and is in 2nd gear all of the time. He could have easily played in midfield, he was great on the ball. He was exceptional. He was not one of those that was able to liquefy his body make a block. Every single performance was measured and written – . He scored in the next round against Denmark in the 2002 World Cup in Japan and South Korea – but I chased him about it all the time and it was definitely a personal goal. He did not score too many goals and, even it was that, if I could criticise Rio in 1 way. In terms of everything else he had been a machine but although I really don’t believe coming up for corners and sticking his head. John Terry: John has been an remarkable player. You never watched him get caught out although he did not have was pace. A reader of the game, left-foot, right-foot – a pleasure to watch. You’d train with him and he would take your breath away how great he was to get a centre-half. Generally speaking, they weren’t as good on the ball as he was but although I’m not being patronising to centre-halves. John would toss his body . He would block, he’d win each header. He had been. Occasionally I really think he was under-rated. He had been absolutely outstanding. He was among the bubblier personalities, certainly a leader. He inviting and always talked and, in the changing room before matches, he had been the loudest voice. David Beckham: It was hard to leave out Gary Neville because he was amazing. However, I’m going to put David Beckham in as, well, just look in his England album, his caps and a number of his moments. Naturally, he was a person off the pitch but, from the room and about the group, he was among those lads. He chased a skill which was very unique in the time: how he grabbed the ball; the way he had that shape of whip and dip. He had practically a bend on his free-kicks and corners. He wanted to have a touch and blend it immediately, which will be all you need like a centre-forward. In my novel, I praise him to high heaven but if I mentioned to you asked you when David Beckham did the perfect point in 1998 by kicking someone what do you say? Obviously he didn’t. He got sent off. It was not my fault, the lovers’ or even yours. A mistake was also made by him. Is that harmed our opportunities and that he made a mistake – it did. However, that isn’t going to get in my team and doesn’t mean he is not a terrific player. Ashley Cole: Ashley Cole was regarded at a time. Everybody remembers the time – that he was outstanding in that match. He was that day wing-back: a fantastic defender who can also get. He had the energy and legs to be in a position to do that, and wing-back probably suited him as well. He was with no on your face, talkative. He was reasonably vocal, although he was not the John Terry-leader style. He had been a complete pleasure from the squad. Steven Gerrard: I played with some excellent players – Zinedine Zidane was away from the scale in terms of pure ability – however, if I had been playing the biggest game of my life , the first person I’d likely take into battle would be Stevie. He could do everything. He was enormous , his stride was huge and he just utilised to devour ground. He had been too powerful and too large for his opponents, an awesome passer of the ball, so he head, handle and could score goals, defend. There was not anything really he could not do. If you ask him to sit in midfield because he’s just too good for this, the one thing is. I can’t offer any higher praise than that to him. We were mates. I joined Liverpool and we played in exactly precisely the group right through. We grew up playing together with each other. We know each other’s games possibly more . We had that sixth sense . I believe he is genuinely one of the best England payers to have lived. Paul Scholes: he played a level that is different to most and Everyone says Paul is a genius of an individual player. Since he’s forever looking another way you’ve got to really understand the principles of disguise along with the game for you to play with Scholesy. You believe he has not seen you and he then whips your toes and one round the corner together. You got to be on you toes with Scholesy. He’s presuming a step ahead of all people – and you could make him seem a player that is lousy because he’ll wind up as you are currently dreaming of something 35, giving away the ball! He was supremely gifted, scored goals and needed a radar using a pass. He was unassuming. He was first off the practice ground. Once I completed training, have my lunch I had been wanting to get in the shower and get home – but by the time I had got into the dressing room, Scholesy also moved and had already had a shower. He was quite evasive. Frank Lampard: Frank’s goalscoring record is incredible. To get a midfielder that number of goals is extremely scarce and, for this he gets in my own team. He deserves the maximum praise for receiving and commitment the most from his profession, rather like Beckham in several ways. He practised and cried. Despite the fact that you have Scholes, who is only you’ve got people such as Frank and David who have been there after refining their skills and training hitting balls. Plenty of people questioned whether the partnership that was Lampard-Gerrard could work and it was probably because they were both too great. It had been too tempting to get forward that we didn’t have as much discipline in the centre of midfield. Then I think they would have thrived When we had an additional body, such as a Scholesy – Scholesy {sitting and enjoying with the quarter-back role then Frank and S Read more: https://bcuknowledgenow.com/snooker-tips/
  • このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加